Email Address/Membership Number is required!
Password is required!
Account not activated. Check your inbox for the activation email, or follow Forgotten Password link to reset your account.

Demonstrating Quality and Outcomes in Psycho-oncology

Demonstrating Quality and Outcomes in Psycho-oncology

Access My Best Price

This is a PDF download licensed for personal use only – read full licence terms

Quick Overview

This report outlines a rigorous, multidimensional framework for evaluating quality and outcomes in psycho-oncology services, which can be flexibly adapted to local needs and priorities.


It aims to challenge psycho-oncology services to develop and standardise procedures that address the clinical and operational aspects of quality, while maintaining a firm focus on the experiential.


The proposed framework focuses on six key domains of service quality:



  • Is this service safe?

  • Is this service equitable, while also focused on those most in need?

  • Is this service timely and responsive?

  • Is this service respectful, collaborative and patient-centred?

  • Is this service offering effective interventions?

  • Is this service contributing to efficient multidisciplinary care?


To address these domains, psycho-oncology services need to draw on multiple, convergent sources of data, including key performance indicators, activity levels, patient self-report measures, feedback from professional colleagues, etc.

Details

Contents

Executive summary

Scope of this document

Endorsements

Psycho-oncology services

What do we mean by quality and outcomes?

A framework for quality and outcomes in psycho-oncology

Data sources

(i) Key performance indicators
(ii) Activity levels
(iii) Staff qualifications, registration/accreditation and supervision
(iv) Quantitative patient self-report measures
(v) Qualitative patient feedback
(vi) Feedback from professional colleagues
(vii) Additional data sources

Addressing outcomes and quality

(i) Is this service safe?
(ii) Is this service equitable, while also focused on those most in need?
(iii) Is this service timely and responsive?
(iv) Is this service respectful, collaborative and patient-centred?
(v) Is this service offering effective interventions?
(vi) Is this service contributing to efficient multidisciplinary care?

Summary

Summary for cancer managers and commissioners

Report authors

References

Appendix I: A co-designed evaluation of a reflective practice/supervision group

Appendix II: Service quality and outcomes checklist

 

Additional Information

SKU PUB-CAT-1704